Friday, December 23, 2016

Gold Posts Longest Run of Weekly Losses in More Than a Decade

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-23/gold-heading-for-longest-run-of-losses-in-more-than-a-year

Gold Posts Longest Run of Weekly Losses in More Than a Decade


Gold futures capped the longest run of weekly losses in 12 years as investors flee bullion-backed funds on bets stronger economic growth will bolster the Federal Reserve’s case to raise U.S. interest rates.
A rebound Friday wasn’t enough to avoid a seventh weekly decline, the longest stretch since May 2004. The central bank indicated last week it may raise rates three times in 2017, moves that could be bolstered by a report Thursday showing the U.S. grew at the fastest pace in two years. Holdings in exchange-traded funds backed by bullion fell a 30th day.
It was an erratic year for gold, with the biggest first-half rally in almost four decades giving way to a retreat as focus shifted from political uncertainty on the Brexit vote to U.S. monetary policy. Holdings in ETFs have shrunk continuously since Donald Trump won the U.S. election, fueling optimism fiscal stimulus will energize the economy and driving a gauge of the dollar to the highest levels since at least 2005.
“It’s a changing of the trend,” said Erik Tatje, a market strategist at RJO Futures in Chicago. “As we look at a rising interest-rate environment, that will add value to the dollar. That will put tremendous downside pressure on gold.”
Gold futures for February delivery rose 0.2 percent to settle at $1,133.60 at 12:37 p.m. on the Comex in New York, paring its loss this week to 0.3 percent. Bullion increased Friday as the dollar reversed gains and some chart-following traders saw supportive momentum indicators, Tai Wong, director of commodity products trading at BMO Capital Markets in New York, said by telephone.
Gold for immediate delivery declined 0.2 percent this week, also marking a seventh weekly decline, the longest stretch since August 2015.
Holdings in ETFs declined 3.92 tons to 1,779.3 tons on Thursday, extending the longest run of declines since September 2004.
Traders are pricing in a 74 percent chance of a rate increase by June, following the Fed’s 25 basis point hike this month.
In other precious metals:
  • Silver futures for March delivery -0.7% to $15.759/oz on Comex
  • Platinum futures for April delivery -1.5% at $895.00/oz on New York Mercantile Exchange
  • March palladium futures -0.3% to $654.85/oz on Nymex

Here’s why you should never buy and hold gold

http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-why-you-should-never-buy-and-hold-gold-2016-12

Buying and holding a commodity like gold may be the most ignorant strategy ever…
That’s a heresy to some gold “experts” who think they can predict its price direction.
But here’s the cold hard truth: The market doesn’t care about what you, I, or any “expert” thinks should happen.
To make money from gold, you’re either on the right side or the wrong side of the price trend.
Today, I’m going to show you how to be “right” when investing in gold…

“Buy and Hope” Strikes Again

Let’s take a look at what’s happened to the price of gold this year…
Screen Shot 2016 12 20 at 9.34.23 AM 
 
Gold started the year on a tear following a December 2015 Fed rate hike, sharply declining oil prices and trouble in China that sent stock markets around the world tumbling.

A surge of money steered toward gold’s safe haven almost immediately.
And as the gold price trended higher, Wall Street and Main Street jumped on the bandwagon…
In May, JP Morgan told clients to “position for a new and very long bull market for gold.”
Goldman Sachs joined the party in June by raising its average gold price forecasts in the near and long term, extending into 2018.
And Merrill Lynch as recently as early October recommended buying gold on a brief dip because its analysts believed that when the Fed raised interest rates, stocks would sell off, the dollar would rally, and investors would see gold prices trend higher.
But there was one big freaking problem…
These “trust us” recommendations never gave you an exit plan.
Most investors just followed the tried-and-true “buy and hope” strategy. They bought and hoped gold stocks would continue to move higher as the “experts” predicted.
How’d that work out for them?
If you bought in May per JP Morgan’s call, you got in around $1,270. If you bought in June per Goldman’s call, you got in around $1,324. If you bought in October per Merrill’s call, you got in around $1,256.
Today, gold trades near $1,140.
Most people who bought and held on without a clear exit strategy are down big.

How Do You Make Money in Gold?

The answer to that question is you don’t rely on “buy and hope.”
Like many commodity markets, gold is famous for its boom-and-bust cycles.
Gold is especially vulnerable to emotional investing. Every nervous global twitch can cause a big swing in prices because so many people have their political beliefs tied to gold.
The bottom line is it’s incredibly hard to consistently make money in gold if you’re simply buying and holding, instead of using a systematic strategy like momentum-focused trend following trading.
Sure, you may get lucky once in a while and thus imagine you are the next “Oracle of Omaha.” But what I’m talking about is a system of capturing strong, repeatable gains in the long run, in whatever market that’s trending.
For example, my proprietary Trend Following system triggered a buy signal for gold stock Hecla Mining on April 20 – and a sell signal on October 10, capturing a solid 43% gain.
But the immensely important point is my system triggered a sell signal as soon as the trend changed.
The big-time decline was avoided.
If you followed my straightforward system, you would have not only pocketed a gain of 43%—but also avoided the big loss.
But most don’t know to follow this kind of momentum, crowd-following system.
Instead of going with the trend no matter what, they fantasize about forecasts of gold going to the moon… and then on to Mars.
And they’re still waiting for it to happen because the thrill of being right is more important to them than making money.
But while significant numbers of investors were dreaming about making a fortune in gold while stockpiling for Armageddon, the trend changed like a bucking bronco.
Most of these investors were gobsmacked.
Remember, when any market moves either up or down, you either get on board on the right side of the trend or you get killed. Guaranteed.
So ask yourself: Are you riding the gold trend? Or are you just guessing gold’s direction?

Indians Living Overseas Stuck With Banned Rupees

http://www.wsj.com/articles/indians-living-overseas-stuck-with-banned-rupees-1482316241

When India abruptly banned its largest-denomination bank notes last month, New York City resident Raj Karnawat’s nearly $3,000 stash of rupees became essentially worthless, overnight.
“It’s not a small amount of money for a middle-class family to lose through no fault of our own,” said Mr. Karnawat, a citizen of India and the U.S. whose family owns a wholesale precious-stone business in Manhattan. “There was no way to be prepared for this.”

About 16 million Indians live outside the country, the largest nonresident population in the world, according to a 2015 United Nations report. In the U.S. alone, there are more than three million people of Asian-Indian origin, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates.

Many say they were floored when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced in early November he was voiding the 500- and 1,000-rupee bills to thwart corruption, counterfeiting and tax evasion.

The Indian government has set a deadline of Dec. 30 to deposit the old bills, but this option is largely unavailable outside the country. Indians living abroad are only allowed to deposit the banned bills into a special bank account, called a non-resident ordinary account, that many say they don’t have.
Currency-exchange services and many overseas branches of Indian banks aren’t accepting the bills for exchange or deposit because Mr. Modi’s decision rendered them illegal.
The 500- and 1,000-rupee bills are worth only about $7.50 and $15, respectively, but many overseas Indians keep piles on hand to pay for small expenses such as taxis, hotels or gifts during visits without having to pay foreign-exchange fees.
“There is a huge Indian diaspora outside of India and all of us are trying to figure it out,” said Vaibhav Agrawal, who lives in Chicago and had been keeping about $600 of the now-banned currency for trips to his Indian hometown.
After contacting about a dozen friends, Mr. Agrawal finally found someone traveling to India before year-end to try to exchange his bills.

Mr. Modi’s decision, which took about 86% of India’s currency out of circulation, has already wreaked havoc on India’s cash-based economy and threatened India’s position as one of the fastest-growing emerging markets.

Real estate sales have plummeted while sales of big-ticket items such as vehicles have also dried up as the Indian government struggles to get the new bills into people’s pockets. Critics have labeled it a “war on cash” that has been particularly hard on the poor, who often depend on off-the-books cash payments.

The Modi administration has said the move will eventually lead to better tax collection, improved surveillance of crime networks, and more accurate monitoring of commercial activity itself.
Like many Indians living abroad, Mr. Karnawat in New York built up a stash of rupees through decades of trips back home. “My family travels to India so often it doesn’t make sense to lose out on the exchange rate, the exchange fees when we’re going to be traveling back in a year again,” said Mr. Karnawat, who moved to the U.S. in 1996.

He says he can travel to India before year-end, or find someone traveling to India to exchange the bills for him. But even these paths are ridden with obstacles. Indian banks have stopped exchanging the bills and are now only accepting deposits. Lines often stretch for hours.

Attempts to deposit large amounts could bring tax consequences or legal problems.
Mr. Agrawal in Chicago grew so frustrated with the lack of information about the ban that he sent more than a dozen tweets to India’s central bank, financial minister and the Indian consulate in Chicago.

No one responded, he said. Many Indians have taken to using the hashtag #whataboutNRIs, referring to nonresident Indians.

Gaurav Agarwal, a New Delhi native who now lives in Canada, said he was told by a representative of his Indian bank to mail his C$200 worth of rupees to India for deposit. That “didn’t solve the problem either as currency bills can’t be sent through courier,” he said.

He too began blasting Indian officials on social media, which he acknowledges isn’t the best mode of communication. “But I have no other option left,” he said.
In the Jackson Heights neighborhood of Queens, Shaikh Abdul Hai has searched for weeks for someone traveling to India by year-end to exchange about $300 worth of rupees for him.
“Of course it’s painful to lose the money, I’m a working man,” said Mr. Hai, who works at India Sari Palace, a retailer situated on a block dotted with curry houses and shops known as “Little India.”

Monday, December 19, 2016

Gold price: 'Bullish thesis is dying, if not already dead'

A "bullish thesis" that drove the gold price up by almost a third earlier this year is "dying if not already dead", says Daily FX.
Gold had been at the $1,050 mark at the beginning of the year but turned higher two months later, in the middle of a wider market meltdown and as the Federal Reserve relaxed its outlook for US interest rates.

It went on to surge 31 per cent and even last month was still one of the best-performing assets of the year, with prices up around a fifth.

But last week, the Fed raised rates for the first time this year and delivered its most bullish forecast for some time, setting out plans for three further increases in 2017.

This caught the market off guard - traders had expected the increase but thought the medium-term forecast would be more circumspect, due to the uncertainty over president-elect Donald Trump's likely effect on the US economy.

Instead, there is a general sense that a massive bout of promised infrastructure spending will fuel a surge in inflation.

US Federal Reserve raises interest rates for second time in a decade
All of which is bad news for gold, which does not offer an income yield and so loses out to peers that do when rates are rising. It is also sensitive to the resulting jump in the dollar, which hit a 14-year high this week.

So, gold fell – sharply, losing more than $20 an ounce immediately after the announcement to below $1,140 and then falling as low as $1,122 last night, a ten-and-a-half month nadir.
Daily FX predicts support is currently being found around $1,125, a level at which traders believe it is oversold, and so it proved, with a rebound this morning taking the gold price to $1,134 an ounce.
If gold falls further, there is another technical marker at $1,112, a close below which prices might then slide to $1,100. Any rebound is now also expected to run out of steam at around $1,150, well below the level before this week's rates rise.
 "The effect of the Fed has been huge," Jiang Shu, chief analyst at Shandong Gold Group, told Reuters. "We see at least two rate hike in the first half of 2017 and [gold] prices are going to be lower for a while." 

Gold price plunges below $1,140 after Fed rates surprise

15 December
Gold plunged in afternoon trading in New York yesterday, after the Federal Reserve caught traders off guard with its latest interest rates decision.
The US policymakers voted unanimously to increase base interest rates by 0.25 per cent, to a between 0.5 and 0.75 per cent - the first rates hike this year and only the second in the past decade.
It was a widely expected move, with traders putting the chances of an increase at 100 per cent immediately before the announcement, based on market bets via federal fund futures, Bloomberg reports.
But "it was the Fed's more hawkish stance regarding rate hikes next year that surprised the market," says Investing.com.
The policymakers now forecast they will vote to increase interest rates three times next year, up from the two predicted in September and a sign of confidence in the US economy.
The news brought spot gold, which had been around $1,164 an ounce, plunging to a ten-month low of $1,141 by the end of US trading. It dipped to below $1,138 an ounce this morning.
According to The Guardian, Fed chairwoman Janet Yellen told reporters: "It's important for households and businesses to understand that my colleagues and I have judged the course of the US economy to be strong.
"We have a strong labour market and we have a resilient economy."
Stephen Innes, a senior trader at Oanda in Singapore, said in a note that "this is flat out hawkish", adding: "The market had expected at most a subtle shift in Fed language."
Yellen also said the US economy had added 2.25 million jobs in the past year and that the Fed now sees growth next year of 2.1 per cent, up from a previous forecast of 1.9 per cent.
Analysts speculate the prospect of "Trumpflation" - a surge in inflation following a promised burst of spending by president-elect Donald Trump - could also be prompting the bank to pre-emptively increase interest rates.
While this boosted the dollar to a 14-year high, commodities such as gold and oil, which are priced in dollars, fell.
Rising rates tend to make gold less attractive relative to income-yielding peers. It is also more generally negatively correlated to the US dollar.

Gold price down ahead of Fed rates call

13 December
The gold price was down in London trading today, hovering below $1,160 an ounce and near a nine-month low ahead of a meeting of the US Federal Reserve starting today.
Policy-makers will decide on Wednesday evening whether to increase interest rates, with the consensus being they will hike them for the first time this year.
Rising rates are generally bad for gold as they increase the opportunity cost of holding the non-yielding metal versus other income-generating assets.
They also tend to galvanise the already-strong dollar, against which gold is often held as a hedge.
The Wall Street Journal reports that an increase has been widely expected since the market bounce following the election of Donald Trump and amid hawkish comments from rate-setters in recent weeks.
Many analysts think "that a rate hike [is] already priced into the market".
That would suggest a rise would not push gold much lower than its current level and opens the possibility for gold to surge should the Fed not increase them.
On the other hand, Nitesh Shah, a commodities strategist at ETF Securities in London, said investors will "look ahead to clues on the timing of future rate hikes in 2017".
The Fed will publish a "dot plot" of rate-setters' forecasts in the coming 12 months. If this suggests the pace of increase could pick up with several rises next year, gold could fall sharply.

Gold price 'will slide to $1,100 in 2017'

1 December
Gold endured a fresh bout of selling overnight and in the process clocked up its worst month for three years.
Prices at the end of the New York trading session, the last of November, were down 1.4 per cent, leaving the metal down eight per cent for the month as a whole – its worst performance since June 2013.
Mining.com says gold has "now trimmed its year to date gains to 9.8 per cent".
Initial fears over the impact of a Donald Trump presidency on the global economy have given way to speculation on the inflationary effects of his investment plan, boosting the dollar and bringing pressure on gold.
Interest rates could rise to counter a surge in inflation, which would hurt the non-yielding metal. Traders give a 99 per cent chance of a rise being announced at this month's Federal Reserve meeting, says the Wall Street Journal.
Prices were still tumbling in Asia this morning, hitting $1,163 an ounce and the lowest level since the beginning of February. Gold had recovered only slightly to $1,168 in London by mid-morning.
The latest move lower came after another surge in the dollar, which reached nine and a half-month highs against the Japanese yen after the Opec deal to cut supply lifted oil prices and added to the sense that inflation is set to soar, says Reuters.
Gold is treated as a pseudo-currency and a hedge against the dollar, so the two tend to move in opposite directions.
"From an investor point of view there is little reason to hold gold," said Georgette Boele, a currency and commodity strategist at ABN Amro.
Technical analysts believe having broken below $1,170, gold could now test the next "resistance" level at $1,150 an ounce. ABN Amro predicts the price will fall to $1,100 next year.
One issue on the horizon that could turn the selling tide is the Italian constitutional referendum this weekend. A No vote rejecting a series of changes to the political system is expected to bring down Mario Renzi's government and trigger renewed global uncertainty.
Uncertainty tends to push investors to safe havens such as gold, so the metal could see a short-term bounce.

Gold price nears ten-month low and could fall to $1,150

24 November
The gold price closed in on its lowest level for ten months yesterday, hitting a nadir of $1,180 before recovering slightly.
Having fallen in excess of ten per cent from a brief post-US presidential election high of $1,337, the precious metal remains under pressure ahead of an expected increase in US interest rates next month.
New figures show spending by US companies grew 4.8 per cent last month, its biggest gain in a year. Coupled with recent strong labour reports and positive rhetoric from policymakers, this has convinced traders borrowing costs will rise in December, with market bets putting the likelihood near 100 per cent.
Looking into next year, markets are booming on the back of speculation that a spending splurge by incoming president Donald Trump will fuel a rapid rise in inflation, while the dollar is at a 14-year high.
A spike in inflation would hurt non-yielding gold if it triggers even more rapid rate rises. The boost in the dollar is biting now as gold is often held as a hedge against the US currency.
Trading today has been thin and US markets are on holiday, leaving the gold price standing at $1,185 an ounce. So where does it go from here?
DailyFX is still pointing to a technical marker of around $1,171 an ounce and says if this is breached, the price may "target" the next foothold lower, at $1,152.
If the market rebounds, however, and gold moves back above $1,200, traders should look for resistance at another technical indicator around $1,234 an ounce.

Gold price is 'getting slammed' below $1,200

23 November
The gold price is "getting slammed" on a stronger dollar and ever-greater certainty that the US Federal Reserve will increase interest rates next month, says Business Insider.
Gold was holding within its narrow range above $1,210 an ounce after Asian trading this morning, but it has since plummeted by more than $25 to around $1,185.
This is the first fall below the important $1,200 threshold since February and marks a sharp 11 per cent reversal from a peak of $1,337 an ounce in the wake of Donald Trump's US presidential election triumph earlier this month.
Uncertainty over the incoming president's economic agenda was expected to propel the metal on, perhaps to $1,500. However, it has confounded analysts by slumping while equity markets soar to new record highs.
It's not just a risk-on move that is hurting the "safe haven": a pledged $1trn (£800bn) infrastructure spending boost could send inflation soaring, prompting an interest rate rises in response.
The Fed is expected to hike rates for the second time in a year next month following more strong economic data showing US companies are continuing to increase spending.
Gold tends to do badly when interest rates are rising because, as it does not provide any income, it carries a high opportunity cost. Rising inflation and rates expectations are also boosting the dollar, against which the metal is held as a hedge.
Prices could fall further from here, with analysts having previously highlighted a technical resistance level around $1,170 as a target.
Nevertheless, Robin Bhar, the head of metals research at Societe Generale in London, said there was a chance gold might bounce back in a "sell the rumour, buy the fact" rally if the Fed does act next month.

Apple Could Swallow Whole Russian Stock Market

If you owned Apple Inc., and sold it, you could purchase the entire stock market of Russia, and still have enough change to buy every Russian an iPhone 6 Plus.

The CHART OF THE DAY shows the total market capitalization of all public companies in the world’s largest country slipped below that of the world’s most-valued company for the first time on record. The gap, at $121 billion on Nov. 12, is about the price of 143 million contract-free 64-gigabyte iPhones, based on Apple Store prices.

The value of Russian equities has slumped $234 billion to $531 billion this year, while Apple gained $147 billion to $652 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The technology company’s innovation and brand value attract investors, while Russia’s political conflicts, sanctions and the threat of economic stagnation next year make them nervous, according to Vadim Bit-Avragim, a portfolio manager who helps oversee about $4 billion at Kapital Asset Management LLC in Moscow.

“Apple works with shareholders to maximize returns and is based where property is protected by law,” Bit-Avragim said. “In Russia, the legislative protection for property is not as good, most state-run companies have poor corporate governance, resources are concentrated in state hands and borrowing costs are shooting up. After all this, when you get involved in conflicts with your neighbors, it becomes very hard to persuade investors from all over the world to invest here.” Russia faces a 70 percent chance of recession in the next 12 months, economists surveyed by Bloomberg project. The country is buckling under sanctions punishing its involvement in Ukraine, while a plunging ruble stokes inflation and the sinking oil price erodes export revenue.
Russia, the 20th largest among the world’s major markets, is not the only one Apple has surpassed. The company, which forecasts a record holiday-sales quarter and has $155 billion in cash, is also bigger than 17th-ranked Singapore and 18th-ranked Italy.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Why It’s The Perfect Time To Buy Stocks

December 9, 2016, 9:00pm EST
http://www.billionairesportfolio.com/why-its-the-perfect-time-to-buy-stocks/4305 
We’ve talked a lot about the set ups for big moves in Japanese and German stocks, as these major stock markets have lagged the recovery in the U.S.
Many have yet to come to the realization that a higher growth, healthier U.S. economy is good for everyone — starting with developed marketeconomies. And it unquestionably applies to emerging market economies, despite the fears of trade constraints.


A trillion dollars of U.S. money to be repatriated, has the dollar on a run that will likely end with USDJPY dramatically higher, and the euro dramatically lower (maybe all-time lows of 0.83 cents, before it’s said and done). This is wildly stimulative for those economies, and inflation producing for two spots in the world that have been staring down the abyss of deflation.

This currency effect, along with the higher U.S. growth effect on German and Japanese stocks will put the stock markets in these countries into aggressive catch up mode. I think the acceleration started this week.

As I said last week, Japanese stocks still haven’t yet taken out the 2015 highs. Nor have German stocks, though both made up significant ground this week. Yen hedged Nikkei was up 4.5% this week. The euro hedged Dax was up 7.6%.

What about U.S. stocks? It’s not too late. As I’ve said, it’s just getting started.

We’ve talked quite a bit about the simple fundamental and technical reasons stocks are climbing and still have a lot of upside ahead, but it’s worth reiterating. The long-term trajectory of stocks still has a large gap to close to restore the lost gains of the past nine-plus years, from the 2007 pre-crisis highs. And from a valuation standpoint, stocks are still quite cheap relative to ultra-low interest rate environments. Add to that, a boost in growth will make the stock market even cheaper. As the “E” in the P/E goes up, the ratio goes down. It all argues for much higher stocks. All we’ve needed is a catalyst. And now we have it. It’s the Trump effect.

But it has little to do with blindly assuming a perfect presidential run. It has everything to do with a policy sea change, in a world that has been starving (desperately needing) radical structural change to promote growth.

Not only is this catch up time for foreign stocks. But it’s catch up time for the average investor. The outlook for a sustainable and higher growth economy, along with investor and business-friendly policies is setting the table for an era of solid wealth creation, in a world that has been stagnant for too long. That stagnation has put both pension funds and individual retirement accounts in mathematically dire situations when projecting out retirement benefits. So while some folks with limited perspective continue to ask if it’s too late to get off of the sidelines and into stocks, the reality is, it’s the perfect time. For help, follow me and look over my shoulder as I follow the world’s best investors into their best stocks. Our portfolio is up more than 27% this year. You can join me here and get positioned for a big 2017.

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Here's what 9 Wall Street pros are predicting for the stock market in 2017

After the worst start to a year ever, the stock market surged to new highs in 2016.
All the major indexes rebounded to records and defied the doomsday forecasts that preceded events like Brexit and President-elect Donald Trump's election.
For next year, no strategist at a top Wall Street firm forecasts that the bull market will end. Many expect America's largest companies to return to earnings growth, and to see other benefits from Trump's promises to cut taxes and ease regulations.
Near this time last year, the median year-end forecast for the benchmark S&P 500 index was 2,178 according to Bloomberg. On Thursday, December 8, the S&P 500 closed at 2,246.19, up 12% for the year, and higher than the forecast from the most bullish strategist, Fundstrat's Tom Lee.
Here's what some of the pros are saying about 2017:

2,300* — Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Comment: "2017 may be the least certain in years, with higher-than-usual risks and a binary set of outcomes that have dramatically contrasting results: euphoria or fizzle, significantly higher or lower than the base case," said Savita Subramanian.
"As the likelihood of pro-growth policies waxes and wanes in the coming months, we see potential for big market swings. Risk/reward will be more important than absolute targets."
*2017 could be a binary year where the market falls to 1,600 in the bear case and rises to 2,700 in the bull case, Subramanian said.

2,300* — Credit Suisse

Comment: "The key positive for 2017, in our judgment, is that investors are overweight deflation hedges (i.e. bonds) relative to inflation hedges (equities) at a time when policy makers are moving away from NIRP towards fiscal stimulus, and inflation expectations are set to continue rising," said Andrew Garthwaite.
"However, we see a down market in H2 2017, hence our year-end 2017 target of 2,300. The second half challenges include the potential negative impact of US bond yields above 3% (3% being the CS view for end-2017); the growing pricing power of US labor squeezing profit margins; and the risk of China refocusing on reform rather than pro-growth policies. We continue to prefer equities to both bonds and gold."
*2,350 mid-year

2,300 — UBS

Comment: "Despite the potential for more volatility, we expect the Bull to celebrate its 8th birthday in March 2017," Julian Emanuel said.
"No recession is in sight, for now. However, the old saying 'Three Steps and a Stumble' could put stocks to the test when the Fed hikes again after a hike this December."

2,300 — Goldman

Comment: "'Hope' is potential for positive EPS revisions from lower corporate taxes, repatriation of overseas cash, less regulation, and fiscal stimulus," David Kostin said.
"'Fear' is risk that budget deficit limits tax reform, rising inflation prompts Fed to tighten steadily, and bond yields continue to rise."

2,325 — Citi

Comment: "Our PULSE framework is neutral on 4 fronts (unanticipated, earnings, sentiment and liquidity), and is still positive on valuation," said Tobias Levkovich.
"The normalized earnings yield gap analysis stands at 1.57 standard deviations below its 40-year average, yielding an 87% chance of higher markets in a year’s time... after essentially achieving our mid-2016 S&P 500 target of 2,100, we see possible late year softness given a year-end 2016 objective of 2,150... additional gains are reasonable in the next 12-15 months, but not outstanding; our mid-2017 target is 2,250 while our preliminary 2017 year-end target is 2,325."

2,325 — Jefferies

Comment: "A regime shift occurred almost overnight following Trump’s victory," Sean Darby said.
"Trumponomics: fiscal relaxation and protectionism are both inflationary and US dollar bullish. The unfolding of Trump’s policies will occur at a time when wages are increasing. Buy the consumer. Equities are benefiting from the unwinding of the momentum trade in fixed income and reach for yield, but a strong dollar will act as a ceiling for earnings and will tighten liquidity conditions."

2,350 — BMO

Comment: "We believe the S&P 500 has a very good chance of delivering at least high-single-digit percentage gains in 2017 as the market transitions from P/E to EPS-driven gains and copes with the positives and negatives associated with a Trump administration and the changing policy dynamics it generates," said Brian Belski.
"That being said, bouts of increased doubt and rhetoric are sure to generate consternation, with volatility representing a constant theme. However, the resiliency of US companies has proven itself time and time again throughout this bull market, and investors should avoid trying to time the market, in our view."

2,350 — Deutsche Bank

Comment: "The S&P 500 should be 2250 by inauguration and 2300 upon a sizable corporate tax rate cut," said David Bianco.
"The corporate tax rate is likely cut in the first 100 days and other proposed major corporate tax code changes deferred. The time in-between inauguration and tax cuts is risky; waiting for stimulus when rates and FX markets reflect such will cap stocks."

2,400 — JPMorgan

Comment: "We think that, fundamentally, risks for equities in 2017 are likely to be higher compared to this year," said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas.
"Prospects of pro-growth policy reforms under the new US administration are main sources of upside risk to our targets, but both the passage and efficacy of these measures are far from certain at this moment. Stronger USD and higher rates are main sources of downside risk for corporate earnings and the equity multiple, especially if those trends are not supported by stronger growth expectations.
Source: JPMorgan

Monday, December 5, 2016

The Dow 20000 Man Sees a ‘Safety Bubble

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dow-20000-man-sees-a-safety-bubble-1480907342?mod=whatnext&cx_navSource=cx_picks&cx_tag=poptarget&cx_artPos=2#cxrecs_s


 In mid-2012, when Seth Masters said the Dow Jones Industrial Average would cross 20000 by 2020, he took a lot of flak for being a cockeyed optimist.

Mr. Masters, chief investment officer at AllianceBernstein’s Bernstein Global Wealth Management, made the call with the Dow at 12500, when stocks were in the middle of a long bull market, and coming off a debt crisis in Europe. Many felt that central-bank policy around the world would cause a meltdown.

“We felt there was a lot of evidence that the financial system had, in fact, done a remarkably good job of healing itself, especially in the U.S.,” Mr. Masters says. “The corporate sector was becoming surprisingly healthy, and so there was really a once-in-a-generation type of opportunity to take advantage of a misperception of reality.” As stocks rose, he sped up his timing, calling for Dow 20000 by 2018.

With the benchmark past 19000 and less than 5% from Mr. Masters’s target, you would think he would be in the clear. But he also has predicted the bursting of a “safety bubble” in dividend-paying stocks that could slow the Dow’s advance.

Here are edited excerpts from a recent interview:

WSJ: Did you ever regret sticking your neck out with a number attached to your forecast?
MR. MASTERS: The really dangerous thing is to come out with a number and a date. That’s why when we wrote the original piece I made a point to frame our forecast as a median and talked explicitly about ways we could be wrong, especially on the downside. Sure, there are times when you think you’ll be wrong, but from 2012 to 2014, we were wrong because we hadn’t been optimistic enough. That’s why in 2014, we put out an update that said “We’re ahead of schedule for Dow 20000, but don’t expect the markets to do nearly as well from here to 20000 as they have from 2012 to 2014.”

WSJ: By 2015, you were talking about the safety bubble. How did the market create that problem in the middle of a bullish run?
 
MR. MASTERS: There was—and is—some legitimate paranoia about if we would ever really be safe again. Even as people became more optimistic, they craved safety in the wake of the [2008] financial crisis. But when lots of investors start thinking it’s a great time to pile into utilities and telecoms and consumer staples and other dividend-rich, relatively stable companies, their price goes up. As that happens, [safe stocks] become risky, because there is a point where anything is so expensive that it’s risky.…By 2015, we started seeing many of these safe companies priced at 20% to 30% premiums to the market [on a price/earnings ratio basis], and that didn’t make sense.
As a result, people hedged their bets and exposed themselves primarily to assets they perceived as safe. The obvious safe asset is an investment-grade bond, so the analogy that carried over to equities was for stocks that, as much as possible, have bondlike characteristics, or relatively stable businesses that don’t grow that fast but aren’t likely to blow up. Because they aren’t growing that fast, they have the ability to pay a lot of dividends, so they have a fair amount of yield like bonds, as well.
Having a lot of your return come in the form of yield gives you in general less volatility, but the market historically values companies of that type at a discount because it’s logical that if things don’t grow much you probably shouldn’t value their future potential as highly. As a result, yield-oriented safer stocks as a group historically have traded at about a 7% to 10% discount to the market overall.
WSJ: How does the safety bubble play out?

MR. MASTERS: As interest rates have started to go up, investors who bought safety stocks are experiencing a double whammy. First, because these stocks are bondlike in their characteristics, they’re interest-rate sensitive, so rising rates are bad for them. That isn’t what people expected…so people are beginning to dump them. Thus, from both a risk and a diversification standpoint, it turns out these safe stocks aren’t so great. So over the next few years we will see a slow leak out of the safety bubble.

The other realization hitting people who bought these stocks is, “If rising rates actually lead to this type of stock underperforming, then my safe-stock portfolio will actually do the same thing as my supposedly diversifying bond portfolio. Whoops, that’s not a good outcome either; my diversified portfolio isn’t so diversified.”

WSJ: That creates a headwind for the market. Does it stop the Dow from reaching your target?
 
MR. MASTERS: The rest of the market has pretty attractive stocks in it as long as we have some economic growth, which it looks like we are getting. We’re pretty optimistic you will get an opportunity to have overall market growth, but at a more subdued rate than we experienced in 2012-13-14. Obviously, there will be a correction at some point, and what is hard to know is whether it will happen before or after we hit 20000. But what we can say with confidence is that we will ultimately end up going through the 20000 level more than once because there will be more volatility ahead.
Mr. Jaffe is a MarketWatch columnist. Email him at cjaffe@marketwatch.com.

Absent From Trump Rally in Stocks? Insider Buying





A wave of investor money has propelled U.S. stocks to records since Donald Trump’s presidential-election victory. But one group has been missing from the buying frenzy: corporate executives.
A total of 3,500 insiders at Russell 3000 companies have unloaded their own stock in the last three weeks, while 467 purchased shares, according to data from The Washington Service, a Bethesda, Maryland-based provider of insider trading data and news. The number of sellers was higher than the monthly average of 1,832 sellers this year through October. Sellers have also increased from the comparable year-ago period, and buyers have decreased.
“It reflects uncertainty over what the economic and regulatory landscape will look like next year,” said Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis Research. “We’ll need to get clarity on what Trump will be able to implement.”
Insider buying and selling doesn’t necessarily presage gains or declines in a given firm’s shares, of course. But Wall Street watches the data because insiders are understood to have the best information about their companies’ prospects, and are also typically veterans of their industries with longer-term horizons.
While they have historically tended to sell more than buy, their behavior since the election diverges from investors, who have exhibited a rapid shift in sentiment and poured money into equities.


The U.S. stock market limped into November, with the S&P 500 falling for nine days straight through Nov. 4, the longest stretch of losses since 1980. Since Nov. 8, investors have wagered Mr. Trump’s presidency will accelerate growth through fiscal spending and tax cuts. The S&P 500 hit four fresh records in November.
“The big increase in insider selling makes sense because we’ve been making all-time market highs,” said Aaron Jett, the Los Angeles-based vice president of global equity research at Bel Air Investment Advisors, which oversees about $8 billion. “A huge portion of their wealth could be tied up with that one stock so they could want to sell to diversify.”
It is normal for executives to sell into market strength, according to Mr. Jett. That said, a prolonged period of outsize selling by insiders would be concerning, he noted.
Since Nov. 8, no other group than banks has been buoyed by optimism surrounding the future Trump presidency amid expectations of higher interest rates and looser regulation. Still, in the last month, 891 insiders of U.S. financial companies sold shares, compared with 425 executives who added, data from The Washington Service show.
Both Mr. Clissold and Mr. Jett said it is more valuable to pay attention to a pickup in executive buying rather than selling, since sales can occur for personal, idiosyncratic reasons, while stock purchases tend to indicate confidence in the company.
On Feb. 11, as bank stocks plummeted to a multiyear low, J.P. Morgan Chase Chief Executive James Dimon bought 500,000 shares of his bank for about $26 million. J.P. Morgan shares rebounded 12% over the next month and have surged 51% since.
There have been two instances in the last seven years when investors stepped up purchases and timed a bottom in stock prices: in March 2009 as the bull market in U.S. equities following the financial crisis was just getting started and in August 2015 after the devaluation of the Chinese yuan sent shock waves across financial markets.
The market is currently in a wait-and-see mode and giving Mr. Trump the benefit of the doubt, according to Bel Air’s Mr. Jett. While the selling by insiders is no cause for alarm yet, it is something to monitor, he said.
“The elephant in the room is what will Trump’s agenda be? Once we get more clarity on that and if it’s pro-growth, we think the market could go further,” said Bel Air’s Jett. “What would make us feel more cautious is if he puts in place more isolationist policies and tries to go after trade agreements. That would hurt the market.”