Monday, July 26, 2021

Temporary or not, inflation is rattling restaurants and broader economy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/07/20/inflation-restaurants-fed-biden/ 


Only once in six years had Mark Maguire raised prices at his North Dallas restaurant.

Then, some of his employees, no doubt noticing the banners touting $1,000 signing bonuses at other eateries, demanded higher wages. And his suppliers hiked the cost of chicken, beef and cooking oil.

Maguire’s costs rose so much so fast that he’s had to rewrite his menu prices twice since March. Whether additional increases will follow depends upon a complex interaction of food supplies, labor availability and a shape-shifting virus.

“It’d be foolish for me to believe we’ve seen the worst of it,” he said. “I don’t want to let my mind think about this becoming a long-term deal.”

Neither does the Federal Reserve or the Biden administration, which both insist that the inflationary squall will pass before it unhinges the recovery. On Monday, President Biden called rising prices “temporary” and said his plans for infrastructure spending and pro-competition regulation would drive prices down in the long run.

Consumer confidence readings, however, are sagging, and the unpredictable landscape confronting Maguire, 57, helps explain why some employers lack Washington’s confidence.

White House economists liken today’s fast-rising prices to a temporary bout of inflation following the end of World War II. But Fed officials concede that they already have been surprised by the recovery’s initial chapters and that more surprises may loom.

“It’s a once-in-a-century experience with a different economy than it was a century ago,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist with the firm Grant Thornton. “There’s just no road map.”

Last week’s Labor Department report that consumer prices rose 5.4 percent in June, their fastest pace in 13 years, reignited a debate about whether officials have overstimulated the economy.

Congress over the past 16 months has spent more than $5 trillion to support growth, while the Fed has kept interest rates near zero and purchased more than $4 trillion in bonds.

The Fed says it will tolerate, for an unspecified period, inflation running “moderately” above its long-term 2 percent goal. But critics such as former treasury secretary Larry Summers warn of an inflationary spiral resembling the decade-long rise that began in the late 1960s.

Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell acknowledged last week that the current pace of price increases is excessive, while reiterating that they will subside as the economy works out its reopening kinks.

Speaking at the White House on Monday, the president said that “no serious economist” believes that “unchecked inflation” is likely. He blamed the rising cost of living on the strains of economic reopening.

“You can’t flip the global economic light back on and not expect this to happen,” Biden said.

Normally, the Fed would raise interest rates to cool off rising prices. But with employment still more than 10 million jobs below its pre-pandemic trend, and with profound uncertainty about the pace of rehiring, the environment is anything but normal.

“The challenge we’re confronting is how to react to this inflation, which is larger than we had expected or anybody had expected,” Powell told the Senate Banking Committee last week. “To the extent that it is temporary, it wouldn’t be appropriate to react to it.”

If the Fed is correct, inflation will slow as production bottlenecks ease and government stimulus wears off. But if the price increases trigger a vicious cycle of accelerating wage gains, the central bank could be forced to raise interest rates abruptly, potentially plunging the nation into a new recession.

The pandemic is clearly responsible for some unusual price surges, such as for hotel rooms and airfares. Used-car and truck prices also jumped by 10.5 percent in June, the largest one-month rise since the government started keeping track in 1953, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

That sharp increase stems from a shortage of semiconductors that have interrupted production of new cars and prompted some buyers to consider used models instead. At the same time, rental-car companies that reacted to last year’s pandemic shutdowns by selling their fleets are now scrambling to restock by buying used cars at auctions, further boosting demand.

But those factors will not last. Automakers’ production “should be much stronger throughout the second half of the year,” increasing dealers’ inventories of new cars and easing sticker shock, JPMorgan Chase economist Dan Silver wrote in a research note Friday.

“Consumer prices for used vehicles could start to head lower soon,” he added.

Indeed, wholesale used-car prices, which generally anticipate prices on dealers’ lots by a couple of months, fell in June by 1.3 percent, according to the widely watched Manheim index.

In other sectors, such as health care and shelter, price increases may prove more sustained, economists said.

Maguire, who once launched restaurants for the Walt Disney World Co., is trying to solve the same puzzle Powell is confronting. Like the Fed chair, the restaurant owner sees reason to believe inflation will cool. The cost of a 20-pound box of chicken breasts, which soared in 90 days from $42 to $113, already has eased to $92, he said.

But the big question is whether Maguire can get and keep enough workers to serve all the customers that have been flocking to his flagship, Maguire’s Kitchen & Catering, since Texas lifted its coronavirus restrictions in March.

“Business is great,” Maguire said. “We’re seeing super-strong demand. It’s so strong it’s become an issue. It’s hitting us on the labor side with wage pressure and availability.”

He has increased his average hourly wage about 30 percent since March, after a group of workers “came to me and said nobody wants to do this job and we need more money,” he said. “We were afraid we were going to start losing people to other restaurants.”

Cooks can earn $17 an hour, up from $12.50 before the pandemic. Hostesses that made $12 now pocket $15.

Yet Maguire can field only 40 workers, down from a full staff of 55, even as demand tops pre-pandemic levels. During especially busy periods, he’s had to close off up to a quarter of his dining room.

About three-quarters of restaurants surveyed in June said labor recruitment was their top problem, up from just 7 percent in January, according to Hudson Riehle, a senior vice president with the National Restaurant Association.

With labor representing about one-third of a typical restaurants’ costs, rising wages have helped drive menu prices to their fastest increases since 2009, he said.

Restaurant demand is likely to increase as more Americans return to work, especially with consumers sitting on an estimated $2.5 trillion in excess savings. The combination of a steady paycheck and less free time to devote to meal preparation often drives people to eat out, he said.

Michael Strain, a former Fed economist now with the American Enterprise Institute, said the restaurant industry could suffer more-persistent inflation than other sectors. The cost of meals away from home is up 4.1 percent over the past year, below the economy-wide figure, according to the BLS.

“You’re seeing significant price increases in restaurants,” he said, blaming factors including wage pressures.

Like anyone who lived through the 1970s, Maguire recalls the feeling of an economy that seemed to rest on quicksand. He remembers his father marveling at 20 percent mortgage rates and waiting in long lines for scarce supplies of gasoline.

A repeat of that era’s double-digit inflation is unlikely, according to most economists. For one thing, today’s economy is far less unionized, so automatic wage increases don’t ripple across industries the way they once did.

The White House earlier this month said the environment most resembles the inflationary spike that followed World War II. As the government lifted wartime price controls, Americans rushed to buy the automobiles and appliances they had been denied during years of sacrifice.

By July 1946, inflation reached an annual rate of more than 9 percent before peaking in March of the following year at nearly 20 percent. President Harry S. Truman called a special session of Congress in November 1947 to address mounting public concern about prices.

It took 2½ years for the postwar economy to settle down. But by December 1948, inflation had cooled to 3 percent.

Whether a similar cool-down will occur this time remains to be seen. Maguire — and many economists — are trying to assess crosscutting currents in the labor market.

Nationwide, the share of the working-age population actively working or looking for work is below 62 percent, almost two percentage points below the pre-pandemic figure.

Texas opted out of federal pandemic unemployment benefits on June 26, which Maguire hopes will ease his hiring troubles.

Hanging over everything is uncertainty over the pandemic’s trajectory, at a time when the delta variant of the coronavirus is galloping across the country. Just 51 percent of Texans 12 or older are fully vaccinated, compared with more than 56 percent nationwide, according to the state and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As the delta variant spreads, low-income workers who are less likely to be vaccinated could stay on the sidelines, Swonk said. Similarly, women might be unable to return to work if schools are slow to reopen and they lack alternative child care.

“That delta variant scares me,” Maguire said. “I hope it scares enough of the unvaccinated people into getting vaccinated.”

Continued wage pressure as workers remain scarce and demand stays strong means another increase in menu prices “is certainly possible,” Maguire said. But like the chairman of the Fed — and the president of the United States — he is counting on the economy getting back to normal by the end of the year.

Buy American. I Am. By Warren E. Buffett Oct. 16, 2008

   + Omaha  THE financial world is a mess, both in the United States and abroad. Its problems, moreover, have been leaking into the general economy, and the leaks are now turning into a gusher. In the near term, unemployment will rise, business activity will falter and headlines will continue to be scary.  So ... I’ve been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. (This description leaves aside my Berkshire Hathaway holdings, which are all committed to philanthropy.) If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities.  Why?  A simple rule dictates my buying: Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful. And most certainly, fear is now widespread, gripping even seasoned investors. To be sure, investors are right to be wary of highly leveraged entities or businesses in weak competitive positions. But fears regarding the long-term prosperity of the nation’s many sound companies make no sense. These businesses will indeed suffer earnings hiccups, as they always have. But most major companies will be setting new profit records 5, 10 and 20 years from now.  ADVERTISEMENT  Continue reading the main story Let me be clear on one point: I can’t predict the short-term movements of the stock market. I haven’t the faintest idea as to whether stocks will be higher or lower a month — or a year — from now. What is likely, however, is that the market will move higher, perhaps substantially so, well before either sentiment or the economy turns up. So if you wait for the robins, spring will be over.   Image  Credit...Brad Holland A little history here: During the Depression, the Dow hit its low, 41, on July 8, 1932. Economic conditions, though, kept deteriorating until Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in March 1933. By that time, the market had already advanced 30 percent. Or think back to the early days of World War II, when things were going badly for the United States in Europe and the Pacific. The market hit bottom in April 1942, well before Allied fortunes turned. Again, in the early 1980s, the time to buy stocks was when inflation raged and the economy was in the tank. In short, bad news is an investor’s best friend. It lets you buy a slice of America’s future at a marked-down price.  Over the long term, the stock market news will be good. In the 20th century, the United States endured two world wars and other traumatic and expensive military conflicts; the Depression; a dozen or so recessions and financial panics; oil shocks; a flu epidemic; and the resignation of a disgraced president. Yet the Dow rose from 66 to 11,497.  You might think it would have been impossible for an investor to lose money during a century marked by such an extraordinary gain. But some investors did. The hapless ones bought stocks only when they felt comfort in doing so and then proceeded to sell when the headlines made them queasy.  Today people who hold cash equivalents feel comfortable. They shouldn’t. They have opted for a terrible long-term asset, one that pays virtually nothing and is certain to depreciate in value. Indeed, the policies that government will follow in its efforts to alleviate the current crisis will probably prove inflationary and therefore accelerate declines in the real value of cash accounts.  ADVERTISEMENT  Continue reading the main story Equities will almost certainly outperform cash over the next decade, probably by a substantial degree. Those investors who cling now to cash are betting they can efficiently time their move away from it later. In waiting for the comfort of good news, they are ignoring Wayne Gretzky’s advice: “I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been.”  I don’t like to opine on the stock market, and again I emphasize that I have no idea what the market will do in the short term. Nevertheless, I’ll follow the lead of a restaurant that opened in an empty bank building and then advertised: “Put your mouth where your money was.” Today my money and my mouth both say equities.  ADVERTISEMENT  Continue reading the main story Site Index Site Information Navigation © 2021 The New York Times Company NYTCoContact UsAccessibilityWork with usAdvertiseT Brand StudioYour Ad ChoicesPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceTerms of SaleSite MapHelpSubscriptions Already have an account? Log in. Keep reading with one of these options: Limited articles Free Access some articles and personalized email briefings. Log in or create an account Limited time offer Unlimited access $4.25 $1/week for one year Enjoy unlimited news coverage and article access. Cancel online anytime. Subscribe now No commitment required, cancel anytime. Your payment method will automatically be charged in advance every 4 weeks. You will be charged the introductory rate for the introductory period, and thereafter will be charged the standard rate. All subscriptions renew automatically. You can cancel anytime. Mobile apps are not supported on all devices. These offers are not available for current subscribers. Other restrictions and taxes may apply. Offers and pricing are subject to change without notice.


Investors Are Buying American Money managers world-wide put more than $900 billion into U.S. funds in the first half, a record amount

 

Investors Are Buying American

Money managers worldwidehttps://www.wsj.com/articles/investors-are-buying-american-11627205402 put more than $900 billion into U.S. funds in the first half, a record amount

Tuesday, June 8, 2021

When it comes to inflation, the Fed must consider inequality


https://www.ft.com/content/af4394f1-cc0b-4240-9170-daf5d08ed2b8

When it comes to inflation, the Fed must consider inequality


 The US central bank has misread both the data and its mandate KAREN PETROU Add to myFT Fed chair Jay Powell. The central bank’s data are misleading because they assume the US is the middle-class nation it has ceased to be © Daniel Acker/Bloomberg Share on Twitter (opens new window) Share on Facebook (opens new window) Share on LinkedIn (opens new window) Save Karen Petrou YESTERDAY 78 Print this page The writer is author of ‘Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America’ Like most central banks, the US Federal Reserve has been forced to ask why more than a decade of ultra-loose monetary policy has had such lacklustre economic results. The answer is that bad data lead to bad policy. The Fed’s data are misleading because they assume the US is the middle-class nation it has ceased to be. Until it uses data that reflect the nation as it is, the Fed will no more get America back to shared prosperity than someone using a map of New Amsterdam will find the pond in Central Park. Its inflation measures have three significant shortcomings. First, they omit costs such as food, energy and housing. Doing so is tidier, but fails to capture what households actually need and thus what they are likely to do as monetary policy changes. The second problem is that Fed data are gross — even if its preferred cost-of-living indices accurately measured the cost of a basic basket of goods and services, they do not tell us whether families have the debt-free purchasing power to afford it. Apparently small inflation in a gross index can easily translate into painful penny-pinching or risky household leverage, each of which has an adverse macroeconomic impact. Finally, the indices do not measure discretionary spending or financial resilience in ways that forecast how price increases actually affect consumption — for whom and in what way. High-wealth households can trim their sails and stay on financial course; the rest of the nation must dip into scant reserves or go without. Much in current monetary policy is premised on what economists call the marginal propensity to consume — the engine of want that powers demand that then promotes employment and growth or, if unduly overheated, sparks inflation. The Fed still assumes that interest rates drive decisions about how to use discretionary income. But income and wealth inequality is such that now only upper-income households have this marginal propensity, and most of them have more than enough already, so their propensity is small even if their margin is large. In sharp contrast, low, moderate and middle-income families do the consuming even though their ability to respond to interest rates is negligible. These households have little capacity to increase or shrink consumption in response to changing rates because most of them live from one pay cheque to the next. By one recent estimate, 64 per cent of American households are either financially vulnerable or just coping. Year on year, the real cost of living in the US has skyrocketed — homes are up more than 12 per cent, a used car is up 21 per cent, and food costs have risen over 2 per cent. The Fed has recognised a few of these cost increases, but chalks them up to “transitory” factors that do not contribute to the sustained inflation it wants to see before it normalises policy. But it is hard to see which structural factors will reverse far enough and fast enough to erase these cost obstacles to family financial security. In the absence of another deep recession, even a glut of semiconductors or lumber will not lead to deep discounts on any of these essential goods bringing them back to 2019 levels, let alone to levels a family with below median wealth can afford without continuing debt. The US central bank has played a direct, if wholly unintended, role in driving income and wealth inequality to astonishing heights. It did so not only by misreading the data, but also by misunderstanding its mandate. The Fed’s governing law requires it to seek full employment measured by those who want to work, achieve price stability based on purchasing power and set “moderate” interest rates. This is a triple mandate, not the “dual” one the Fed frequently cites, and demands more of the Fed than its preferred version: “maximum” employment and “price stability” measured by the central bank’s own gauge. Inflation is already a painful tax on low, moderate and middle-income households. Released at the end of May, the latest official US number showed an annual inflation rate of 3.6 per cent based on April prices. If the Fed permits this tax to go up, it will let the economy run dangerously hot at a time when ultra-low rates, the Fed’s huge asset portfolio and federal government spending are throwing trillions into the economy without any sign of sustained recovery for those who need it the most. This will not end well unless the Fed recognises the profound impact inequality has on the US economy and recalibrates policy quickly to address it.

Tesla Is Dead (And Elon Musk Knows It)

 

Tesla Is Dead (And Elon Musk Knows It)

https://medium.com/surviving-tomorrow/tesla-is-dead-and-elon-musk-probably-knows-it-2858c86589d0




Tesla Is Dead (And Elon Musk Knows It)

The $600+ billion company is a game-changer, but it won’t exist in 50 years

Jared A. Brock
May 31 · 8 min read
Image credit: Elon Musk as Wario on Saturday Night Live

I will never forget the first time I drove a Tesla Model X. My producer rented one when we met up with a movie star to record narration for a film I was directing. “This better not be tacked onto the film budget,” I griped.

He grinned and tossed me the Tesla-shaped key. “It’s your birthday present.”

I dropped the body to its most ground-hugging setting, set the acceleration to Ludicrous Mode, and roared out of the airport. It was one of the most exhilarating rides of my entire life — almost as fun as the time I drove 150MPH with no plates and no insurance on a toll road as an idiot teenager.

Driving a Tesla X is a pure pleasure, but it doesn’t mean Tesla Inc. will survive.

In fact, forces are aligning that could easily wipe Tesla off the map. Here are seven reasons why Tesla probably won’t exist fifty years from now:

1. It doesn’t make money from selling cars

As professor Scott Galloway recently pointed out, if you subtract Tesla’s Bitcoin ponzi profits and emissions credits, Tesla actually loses money:

“Tesla posts an accounting profit, but in its most recent quarter, it was emissions credits (a regulatory program that rewards auto companies for making electric rather than gas vehicles) and — wait for it — $101 million in bitcoin trading profits that morphed earnings from a miss to a beat. What Tesla did not do last quarter was produce a single one of its two premium cars, the Model S or the Model X.”

Losing money doesn’t seem to worry speculators during peaks of irrational exuberance, but when the rubber meets the road and the stock bubble pops and corporate credit constricts, real investors will want no part in money-burning businesses.

And it won’t take a full market meltdown for Tesla to become a money-losing entity: If the global crypto ponzi bubble pops due to more countries banning or regulating it, or regulators do away with emissions credits, Tesla once again becomes a money-bleeding company.

Image credit: The Martian

2. Elon Musk is too distracted to remain CEO

One thing you’ve got to appreciate about Elon Musk is that he’s voraciously curious and wants to solve some of humanity’s biggest challenges.

But that’s not who you want as CEO of a publicly-traded company.

One of the reasons you don’t see most Fortune 500 CEOs on Joe Rogan and SNL and, you know, running five other companies, is because they’re heads-down focused on running one company. When he ran Disney, Bob Iger woke up at 4:15 AM every day. Apple’s Tim Cook gets up at 3:45 AM and reads 800 emails. Elon Musk also puts in absurd hours — I personally question if sleep deprivation is what rational shareholders are looking for in any CEO — but in Elon’s case, it’s spread across too many projects to be sustainable for decades to come.

3. Elon is already diversifying

Have you ever heard of Dan Schulman?

Me neither.

He’s a former AMEX guy, now the CEO of Paypal.

Elon is brilliant at getting out early and pivoting hard.

He did it with Zip2, and then Paypal, and now he’s putting out feelers to do it with Tesla:

SpaceX.
SolarCity.
Hyperloop.
The Boring Company.
Neuralink.
BTC and DOGE. (Side note: Elon knows he’s the king memer and could easily add $100 billion to his net worth by launching his own altcoin.)

It’s only a matter of time before one of these side hustles takes off and he steps down as Tesla’s CEO, if only because…

4. More regulation and oversight are on the way

Elon once again put Tesla in the crosshairs when he started manipulating the cryptocurrency markets.

Never forget how close he came to getting banned from leading a publicly-traded company by the SEC.

If he keeps up these sorts of shenanigans — and he needs to in order to keep the stock price pumped — it’s only a matter of time before government regulators and progressive politicians renew their efforts to rein him in.

Speaking of lawsuits: There are already rumblings that his SNL Asperger’s announcement should have been disclosed to investors — when the stock tanks, expect to see this admission somewhere in the shareholder lawsuit, whether it’s fair grounds or not.

5. The stock price is wildly overvalued

Cue the angry comments from hodlers. (But please note that I automatically delete comments if the poster doesn’t disclose their TSLA holdings.)

As a sound investment, $TSLA stock is one of the worst picks in the world. As a fun gamble/speculation, it’s one of the best. But, just like Bitcoin, small investors are going to lose hundreds of billions of dollars when the price bubble pops.

Because let’s face it: Tesla is a story stock.

Don’t believe me? Just look at who’s been buying shares:

Image credit: Tulips to Tesla

Tesla stock is clearly being pumped by unsophisticated investors who haven’t done their due diligence regarding the company’s actual long-term worth.

The end result: When thousands of Tesla speculators lose their life savings, many will turn their backs on the company, if not become actively hostile.

What is $TSLA actually worth?

First, we need some context. The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is considered the benchmark number for comparing one company’s stock price to another. The ratio is based on the current stock price divided by the trailing 12-month earnings per share. If a stock price is $10/share, and the P/E ratio is 10, it means that company is earning $1 per share. If you buy a $10 share with a P/E of 20, it’ll roughly take you 20 years to break even.

  • Warren Buffett likes to buy stocks with a P/E of around 12.
  • The S&P 500’s long-term median P/E ratio is around 15.
  • The S&P 500’s current P/E ratio is around 44 — nearly triple its century-long average — despite the pandemic and a looming joblessness crisis. (#Bubble)
  • Apple’s P/E is typically <30.
  • Amazon hovers around 60.

Tesla’s P/E ratio is currently over 600.

That’s $0.99 worth of earnings for every $625 invested. Would you buy a business with an ROI of 0.001584%? Would you acquire a company that will take 600+ years to break even?

Cue the irrational exuberancers: “But Tesla’s future potential is huge!”

No, it’s not, not compared to its current price. To fall in line with the S&P’s historical averages and provide a reasonable rate of real return, Tesla would need to 40X its earnings. To provide a 10% annual return, it would need to 63X its earnings. Well over $2 trillion in annual revenue… 4+X more revenue than the largest revenue-earning company on earth. Not gonna happen.

Objectively, Tesla is wildly overpriced even compared to the overall market bubble. It’s a double bubble — the overall market bubble + the Musk fanboy story stock bubble. Tesla may very well be 13Xs better than the average S&P company right now, but that just means Tesla’s price bubble is that much more inflated once you scrub out all the irrational exuberance.

Tesla’s market cap is currently over $600 billion. If it traded at the same P/E as Amazon — arguably one of the strongest companies on earth — Tesla’s market cap drops to $60 billion. If you compare Tesla to Apple, which is a fair comparison and a far more rational P/E, it means that in reality, Tesla is probably only worth a measly $20 billion.

6. Volkswagen+ will come roaring back

To put things in perspective, Tesla’s market cap is currently higher than Mercedes, BMW, GM, Ferrari, and Ford, plus all the major airlines… combined.

Image credit: The Martian

But does Tesla have more customers, wider distribution, better engineers, deeper pockets, and more political connections than the rest of the auto and airline industries?

Absolutely not.

All his major competitors have deeper capital pools, wider distribution networks, and far more customers. Musk has nowhere near the political power. And the innovation gap is closing rapidly. That’s why Elon is constantly seeking new capital and pulling out all the stops to keep pumping the stock, even going so far as to manipulate people’s psychology through stock splits.

Elon Musk has unquestionably (and rightly) created a Thucydides Trap in the automotive industry, but is Tesla really the Athens that can best Sparta?

The question is almost irrelevant because another company is about to out-Athens Tesla and stuff Elon in his own Thucydides trap:

7. Apple will drop an atomic bomb

When Apple releases an electric car — and you can bet your bottom dollar it will — we can safely assume it will rival Tesla for looks and coolness and will likely beat it on price, too.

Follow the money with me…

  • When Apple makes a car play, it could easily pop Tesla’s 600 P/E bubble…
  • If Tesla deflates to an Apple-level P/E of 30, Tesla is suddenly only worth $20 billion…
  • Which makes it instantly ripe for acquisition by one of the majors, be it Apple, Amazon, BMW, Mercedes, or even an old-school company like GM. (Never forget: Ford once bought Jaguar and Fiat once owned Maserati.)

To be clear, Tesla is an amazing company at a $20 billion valuation, and if Elon can’t keep the $TLSA stock price inflated indefinitely, an acquisition is inevitable. Never mind the bite in Apple’s logo… someone could chomp Tesla whole.

In Conclusion

I adore Tesla. Like Russia and HBO, it punches way above its weight.

I also like Elon, minus his market manipulation. He’s an extremely important person in the carmaking space. I’ll say it loudly: Elon Musk is the best thing to happen to the auto industry since Henry Ford. As a maverick agitator, he awoke the slumbering giants who’d happily relied on fossil fuel combustion for more than a century. We’re better for having him.

But, in the same way that Paypal will continue to lose ground to companies like Wise and Stripe, expect Tesla to lose ground to Volkswagen and Apple and whatever innovators come next. If things play out the way I predict regarding an eventual acquisition, fifty years from now Tesla probably won’t even exist.

In the meantime, don’t buy into the stock hype and endanger your family’s future.

Just rent a Model X for a weekend and enjoy the ride.

Friday, June 4, 2021

CNBC Pro Investors need to ‘HODL’ energy stocks, Fundstrat’s Tom Lee says

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/01/investors-need-to-hodl-energy-stocks-fundstrats-tom-lee-says.html 



Fundstrat Global Advisors co-founder Tom Lee is betting big in energy over the long haul, telling CNBC on Tuesday that he expects strong returns in the sector within the next five years.

“I think if investors want to get involved they need to HODL energy, put an allocation there [and] kind of plug their nose, but I think that’s going to deliver a lot to their portfolio,” Lee said in an appearance on “Fast Money.”