Wednesday, July 12, 2023

Soaring Interest Rates Are Quietly Transforming Oil Markets

 

Soaring Interest Rates Are Quietly Transforming Oil Markets

  • Higher borrowing costs mean price of storing crude increases
  • Inventories are projected to fall in second half of the year
Oil inventories are showing signs of starting to decline.

Oil inventories are showing signs of starting to decline.

Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg
Updated on
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-05/soaring-interest-rates-are-quietly-transforming-the-oil-market
Get Bloomberg's most popular newsletters.
Subscribe now to get the Evening Briefing, Five Things, Matt Levine's Money Stuff, Balance of Power and Tech Daily.
By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service and to receive offers and promotions from Bloomberg.

For oil bulls, one of the biggest caps on prices this year is turning into a tailwind. 

Oil’s 10% drop so far in 2023 confounded some analyst and trader expectations of triple-digit prices as China reopened for business following anti-Covid 19 measures.

Instead, one of the most aggressive rate-tightening cycles by central banks in decades has created a perceived drag on demand, while simultaneously incentivizing traders to sell oil held in storage. That boosted short-term supply to the market at a time when Russian and Iranian oil exports also ballooned.

But now, aided by OPEC+ cuts and those same elevated borrowing costs, inventories are showing signs of starting to decline. With the growing cost of money helping to force barrels out of storage tanks, some bulls now argue the market is nearing a tipping point — setting crude prices up for spikes further down the line.

“Nobody wants to hold inventory, and I think we are, as a world, going toward lower inventory forward cover,” Amrita Sen, co-founder and director of research at Energy Aspects said in a Bloomberg TV interview last month. “If you ask me what did I miss this year it has been the rising cost of capital and what that’s doing to the market, which is destocking.” 

Oil Tries to Fight the Fed

Prices have fallen since rates began rising, but some analysts stay bullish

Source: ICE Futures Europe, Bloomberg

The additional costs of storing oil during a period of sustained high interest rates are stark. 

Take a two-million barrel cargo with prices at, say, $80 a barrel. Based on an interest-rates at 5%, it would cost a trader an $8 million per year in financing to hold onto the consignment.

That effectively means it costs an extra 30 cents per barrel per month to keep supplies. The disincentive to store is doubled when later oil prices are trading at a discount to nearby ones — a structure known as backwardation, that is present at the moment — because it means traders are forced to sell barrels they had stored at a loss. 

Oil refiners, who buy crude and then sell fuels like gasoline and diesel at a later date, also see their profits squeezed by higher financing costs. 

It all serves to increase the chances of the world having to get used to lower levels of oil inventories. 

“A higher cost of capital incentivizes de-stocking,” Goldman Sachs Group Inc. analysts including Callum Bruce wrote in a recent note. “The destocking ends once inventories reach a new, lower equilibrium.”

The bank estimated that higher interest rates have pressured key timespreads — effectively the shape of the futures curve — over the next three years by $8 a barrel. It’s the biggest impact of its kind in decades, they added. 

Draws Dawning

The bulls — whose optimism has proven misplaced so far this year — argue that large oil stockdraws are about to be upon the market. 

The International Energy Agency forecasts demand for OPEC crude and inventories of more than 30 million barrels a day over the second half of the year.

That’s almost 2 million barrels a day more than the group pumped last month. Meanwhile, the US government’s energy research arm also predicts a stockpile decline in the second half.

That fundamental optimism is having to simultaneously battle some of the other — negative — impacts of higher rates. 

Since the Federal Reserve’s first hike, oil prices have persistently come under pressure. Minutes from the Fed’s June meeting showed that a large majority of policymakers agreed that more tightening will likely be needed this year.

Alongside concerns that global energy consumption will suffer as economic growth slows, investors have flocked to assets that have higher yield and less perceived risk. A basket of 16 cross-commodity ETFs is on track for its biggest annual outflow since at least 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

“Investors don’t need to hunt as aggressively for yield as we see in a low interest rate environment,” said Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING Groep NV. 

Cash Is Pulled From Commodity ETFs

2023 on course for biggest outflow since at least 2006

Source: Bloomberg

Note: 2023 figures are year-to-date

This week, the leaders of OPEC+, Saudi Arabia and Russia doubled down on efforts to tighten the market, pledging continued reductions in supply next month. Alongside signs of inventory declines in the US, the bulls argue that a period of market strength is on the horizon.

The question now, is whether higher interest rates will bolster that strength by emptying storage tanks.

“There are higher holding costs, it’s kind of obvious right,” said Gary Ross, a veteran oil consultant turned hedge fund manager at Black Gold Investors LLC. “You don’t want to build inventory with a limping Chinese economy and interest rates rising. We’ve had no choice because supply was greater than demand, but now we are drawing stockpiles.” 

(Updates with minutes of latest Fed meeting in 17th paragraph.)

Thursday, May 18, 2023

Fed’s Bullard suggests higher rates as ‘insurance’ against inflation

 Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.

https://www.ft.com/content/0031bfc1-b8d8-4c2e-b827-b23ae06764f4
Views from hawkish St Louis president reflect policy divisions inside the central bank St Louis Fed president James Bullard, right, with Fed governor Philip Jefferson © REUTERS Fed’s Bullard suggests higher rates as ‘insurance’ against inflation on twitter (opens in a new window) Fed’s Bullard suggests higher rates as ‘insurance’ against inflation on facebook (opens in a new window) Fed’s Bullard suggests higher rates as ‘insurance’ against inflation on linkedin (opens in a new window) Save current progress 0% Colby Smith in Washington 19 MINUTES AGO 1 Print this page Receive free Federal Reserve updates We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Federal Reserve news every morning. A top Federal Reserve official has reaffirmed his support for lifting interest rates further as an “insurance” policy against inflation, underscoring divisions that have emerged at the US central bank about monetary policy. James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis and one of the Fed’s foremost hawks, on Thursday said he would keep an “open mind” going into the next policy meeting in June but suggested he is inclined to back another rate rise after 10 successive increases since last year. Another quarter-point increase would bring the benchmark federal funds rate to a new target range of 5.25-5.50 per cent, higher than most officials deemed necessary in March to curtail inflation and at odds with the pause that Fed chair Jay Powell and other policymakers have recently suggested at a time of great uncertainty. “I do expect disinflation, but it’s been slower than I would have liked, and it may warrant taking out some insurance by raising rates somewhat more to make sure that we really do get inflation under control,” Bullard told the Financial Times in an interview. “Our main risk is that inflation doesn’t go down or even turns around and goes higher, as it did in the 1970s,” he said. Bullard’s comments align closely with those from Lorie Logan, president of the Dallas Fed and a voting member on the Federal Open Market Committee this year, who earlier on Thursday said the case for a pause in June was not yet convincing. Those stand in contrast with remarks from several officials this week who have urged a more cautious approach as well as Fed governor Philip Jefferson, whom the Biden administration just tapped to be the next vice-chair. Jefferson emphasised his expectation for growth to slow this year and for interest rates to be fully felt in the economy. “History shows that monetary policy works with long and variable lags, and that a year is not a long enough period for demand to feel the full effect of higher interest rates,” Jefferson said on Thursday. He also cited a likely drag from recent stress in the banking sector as lenders retrench. Recommended News in-depthUS inflation Fed faces a long battle to trim inflation to its 2% target Bullard said concerns about the impact of banking stress were “overemphasised”, and what is likely to affect the economy more significantly is a recent decline in yields on Treasury bonds. “We’re trying to have this disinflationary pressure and that’s supposed to come through higher rates,” he said, calling it “a bit concerning” that yields are “going in the wrong direction”. He added: “Maybe this will fuel a slower disinflation or even a little bit more inflation going forward than what we intend.” Bullard reiterated that the current benchmark rate is at the low end of a range that would be considered “sufficiently restrictive” — meaning exerting enough pressure on the economy to alleviate price pressures. According to his calculations, a policy rate just above 6 per cent represents the top end of the range. “It would probably be better and more prudent to be in the middle of the zone,” he said, citing that the labour market is also “not just strong, it’s very strong”. Tom Barkin, president of the Richmond Fed, told the Financial Times on Tuesday that “at best” the labour market had moved from “red hot to hot”. Asked about the US congressional stand-off over raising the federal debt ceiling, the St Louis Fed president likened a potential default to “shooting ourselves in the foot” because it will probably lead to a spike in US borrowing costs.https://www.ft.com/content/0031bfc1-b8d8-4c2e-b827-b23ae06764f4