Harvard student blasts climate change protesters for delaying Harvard-Yale football game with 'empty activism'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/harvard-yale-climate-change-protest-game

More than 150 climate change protesters stormed the field at the Harvard-Yale football game Saturday, causing a 40-minute delay.

The protesters, two dozen of whom were arrested, demanded that both Ivy League schools stop funding fossil fuel companies — an act Christopher Colby, a Harvard student and Campus Reform correspondent, blasted as "empty activism" and par for the course on a liberal campus.

CLIMATE PROTESTERS DELAY HARVARD-YALE FOOTBALL GAME AFTER STAGING SIT-IN ON FIELD

"These protesters decided that their version of empty activism for this weekend was going to go sit in the middle of the field, during the game, right in the middle of it, wasting everybody's time," Colby told "Fox & Friends" Monday. "I have to say most people were pretty nonplussed. The protest was pretty poorly planned."

However, Caleb Schwartz, a Harvard student and spokesman for the group Divest Harvard, told ESPN the protest was a result of months of coordination.

"This is a very deliberate choice of targeting this specific [game] to get our action out there," Schwartz told ESPN's Paul Kix.

Colby argued that protesters' demands would hurt the students who need financial aid the most, including many of protesters themselves, "because they wouldn't have funding to go to school anymore."

"Most of my friends were just irked, very annoyed that they got their time taken away from them, but our biggest takeaway, for the most part, was just that this was another empty political activist thing liberals tend to do on big days," Colby said. "It's really quite annoying. I don't think the protest accomplished much."

BOSTON UNIVERSITY STUDENT SAYS BEN SHAPIRO PROTESTERS SHOWED 'INTOLERANCE' ON CAMPUS

Video

Harvard lost 50-43 in double-overtime, but Colby said the "Divest protest didn't help" the historically long game.

Yale referred to the protest as "regrettable" in a statement, saying the Ivy League "stands firmly for the right to free expression" but took issue with how the protesters went about it, adding, "we do not allow disruption of university events."

The protest received support from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who tweeted "Activism disrupts the present to change the future," but many online mocked the protest saying it could only happen at an Ivy League game.

The incident was just the latest in a series of climate demonstrations that erupted in the fall. Protesters held sit-ins in the offices of both House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, demanding more aggressive action on climate change. Actress Jane Fonda has participated in several protests, including one on Friday that resulted in multiple arrests.

Ukraine war accelerates the stealth erosion of dollar dominance

 

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

https://www.ft.com/content/5f13270f-9293-42f9-a4f0-13290109ea02

The writer is professor of economics and political science at the University of California, Berkeley

The decision by the US and allies to freeze Russia’s foreign reserves has unleashed an intense debate about the future of the international monetary system.

That debate is vigorous because the stakes are high and because it is at least 75 years, and the second world war, since similar decisions were taken — and after which the system was transformed. The debate is confusing, however, because it overlooks what has actually been happening to the global monetary system.

Repeated references to “dollar dominance” notwithstanding, the share of dollars in global identified foreign exchange reserves has been trending downward for 20 years, from a bit over 70 per cent at the turn of the century to just 59 per cent in the third quarter of 2021.

This trend is not a result of currency shifts or interest rate changes affecting the value of different reserve assets. It also does not reflect dollar aversion on the part of a handful of banks accumulating large reserve balances. Rather, it is the result of an effort by numerous central banks to diversify away from the US currency.

Now comes the surprise. The diversification is not towards the euro, sterling and yen, the other longstanding constituents of the IMF’s special drawing rights basket, a multicurrency reserve asset. The collective reserve share of these currencies has remained substantially unchanged for two decades.

Moreover, just a quarter of the shift has been into China’s renminbi, which was added to the SDR in 2016. Fully three-quarters has been into the currencies of smaller economies such as Canada, Australia, Sweden, South Korea and Singapore, as a working paper for the IMF that I co-authored shows.

What explains these currencies’ rise? First, their markets have become more liquid. Historically, only a handful of countries possessed deep and liquid markets open to the rest of the world. Foreign exchange dealers were able to find counterparties in only a handful of currencies. In practice, this was mainly the dollar but also the euro, sterling and yen. These were the units used as vehicles for international transactions and that central banks therefore held as reserves.

But the costs of transacting in subsidiary currencies have fallen with the advent of electronic trading platforms and new technologies for automated market-making and liquidity management. We see this in bid-ask spreads on subsidiary currencies, which are now as low — sometimes even lower — than on the euro, yen and pound.

Second, central banks have become more active in chasing returns. Reserve portfolios are larger, raising the stakes.

Third, and relatedly, low yields on the bonds of major reserve-issuing countries have intensified the search for alternatives. Non-traditional reserve currencies regularly offer attractive volatility adjusted returns relative to their traditional counterparts.

Thus, we are already seeing movement towards a more multipolar international monetary system — just not the tripolar system dominated by the dollar, euro and renminbi anticipated by many observers.

Recent events are likely to accelerate diversification. In Russia’s case, admittedly, all consequential reserve issuers except China have actively participated in the reserve freeze. Russia’s long-under way move into non-SDR reserve currencies has not therefore provided it with a haven.

Are you personally affected by the War in Ukraine? We want to hear from you

Are you from Ukraine? Do you have friends and family in or from Ukraine whose lives have been upended? Or perhaps you’re doing something to help those individuals, such as fundraising or housing people in your own homes. We want to hear from you. Tell us via a short survey.

However, now that the sword of a reserve freeze has been unsheathed, one can also envisage a scenario in which the US freezes a country’s reserves but other governments don’t go along. In this case, additional reserve diversification by the target country could have insurance benefits.

What about faster diversification towards the renminbi? Anyone contemplating moving reserves in that direction will have to consider the possibility that China could become subject to secondary sanctions. Moreover, Putin’s actions are a reminder that authoritarian strongmen can act capriciously when there are few domestic counterweights to restrain them. That President Xi Jinping has shown little inclination to interfere in the operations of the People’s Bank of China is no guarantee that he will maintain that stance in the future. It is no coincidence that every leading reserve-currency issuer in history has had a republican or democratic form of government, with checks on executive power.

Russia’s reserve managers have no choice but to turn to the PBoC so long as it continues to grant them access. But for other central banks, an ironic result of the US decision to weaponise the dollar may actually be to slow international take-up of the renminbi.

Shelby/Powell exchange

Fed Chair Jay Powell is asked about the Volcker example.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5004286/user-clip-shelbypowell-exchange